After reading the three articles by Moller, Huett, Foshay and Coleman,
and listening to the Simonson video programs, compare and
contrast the reasons these authors believe there is a need to
evolve distance education to the next generation. Do you agree
with their positions? Why or why not?
After reading and listening to various authors about the
development and growth of distance education, I learned there are many
different beliefs, both similar and different.
Moller, Forshay, Coleman, and Simonson all appear to be in agreement that
distance education is approaching critical mass. Therefore, the focus does not need to be on
promoting distance education, but rather finding ways to support it within training
and educational settings. Moller,
Forshay, and Coleman focus more on the instructional design, implementation,
and overall quality offered from distance education. Simonson discusses how distance education has
evolved over the years, and become more expected and established within
businesses and schools.
According to Moller, Forshay, and Huett (2008a), distance
education can offer learning strategies that are not possible within a face to
face environment (p. 74). This does not
mean that distance education should replace traditional schools. Simonson believes distance education technology
will take on a major role in higher education, K-12 education, professional
development, and trainings within corporations (Laureate
Education, 2008). It is important to evolve
distance education to the next generation because it has gotten uniform in
design and implementation, and therefore, hard to recognize the quality of
learning. For e-learning to become
successfully adopted the instructor must be interested, motivated, and adapt to
the variety of student needs. The
authors acknowledge that e-learning is going to continue to increase, and
everything is already in place for success.
It is up to the instructors to use technology to connect with the
learner in such a way that they think the instruction has been catered
specifically for them.
I believe every
author has their own assumptions and beliefs about distance education. Overall I agree that changes must occur within
areas of design, implementation, standards, guidelines, and faculty support or
the credibility of e-learning will be forever damaged. A distance education teacher should not be
expected to be the instructional designer because it will take way from
content, delivery, and implementation (Huett, Moller, Foshay, & Coleman,
2008, p. 63). I agree the online learning
environment should be equivalent to the traditional classroom environment. I
respect the positions of each author because too many e-learning programs today
are already designed, and the only thing that changes is the professor’s
information in the sidebar. “There must
be a means for both producers and consumers to recognize high quality
e-learning” (Moller et al., 2008a, p. 71).
Lastly, distance education should ensure technology is used efficiently as
a means of connecting the learner with information and users.
References
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W.
R., & Coleman, C. (2008). The evolution of distance
education: Implications for instructional design
on the potential of the web. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve
Learning, 52(5), 63-67. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0199-9
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Distance education: The next generation, defined featuring Dr. Simonson [DVD]. United States: Walden University
Moller, L., Forshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008a). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 52(3), 70-75. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0158-5
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Distance education: The next generation, defined featuring Dr. Simonson [DVD]. United States: Walden University
Moller, L., Forshay, W. R., & Huett, J. (2008a). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 52(3), 70-75. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0158-5
Moller, L., Foshay, W. R., &
Huett, J. (2008b). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional
design on the potential of the web. Techtrends: Linking Research &
Practice to Improve Learning, 52(4), 66-70.
doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0179-0
**Please click on the doi # to open up the article in a new window.**
Mary,
ReplyDeleteFirst, nice blog page. Next, I am total agreement with you about the fact that every author has their own assumptions and beliefs. I too have my own and have come to the conclusion that personality in the classroom as well as online makes a variable difference in online learners and instructors. Word of mouth is a great way to help a program diffuse as well as help it to fail. People have a tendency to voice their feelings and opinions to others in reference to their on-line learning experience. This too can help e-learning evolve to the next generation.