George Siemens
discussed the growing acceptance of distance education in today’s corporate and
educational spheres, including three possible elements of distance education
that are creating more effective learning experiences and giving distance
education an identity of its own distinct from F2F courses: (a) global
diversity, (b) communication, and (c) collaborative interaction. Do you agree
or disagree with his view? Select one of these three elements for your
reflection in this module and respond to the following in your blog:
- How has this element evolved?
- What online tools are available today to facilitate these interactions among learners?
Communication has
evolved over the years not only for personal use, but also in educational
settings. According to Siemens (2008)
distance education is becoming greatly accepted because more people are
experiencing effective communication online (Laureate Education). I believe in a sense, communication and
collaboration goes hand in hand with each other. Without growth in communication, there would
not have been a shift in how we use it to collaborate. Today, the tools we use to communicate make
it possible for us to connect with each other all over the world with the touch
of a button. People can be in many
different places, but still have the luxury of seeing each other in live
time. Distance education allows for
students to communicate in numerous ways, and therefore, learning increases
along with quality. Siemens (2008)
mentioned new communication technologies will continue to have a positive
impact on distance education in the future (Laureate Education). I could not agree more with George Siemens and
his many insights regarding communication and its affect in distance
education. New communication
developments have ultimately helped distance education learner's receive a
more meaningful experience.
There are many online
tools available today to facilitate interactions among learners. As communication technology improves in
quality, distance education will become more distributed, greater contributions
will be made from experts around the world, and there will be an increased use
of multimedia (Laureate Education, 2008).
E-mail, blogs, wikis, discussion boards, text message, Facebook, Twitter,
Skype, Podcasts, webinars, and Pinterest are only a few of the tools available
today. The creation of smart phones has helped to increase interaction between users. Nowadays, people have everything synced up to
their smart phones. The moment an email
arrives, text message, or Facebook notification we are alerted and able to
immediately respond. Embedded cameras in
phones and tablets allow people to chat face to face via Skype or
FaceTime. We have the ability to send
pictures and documents back a forth with each other. Access to the internet is all around us, and
literally in the palm of our hand. We
can easily use these tools to communicate with our classmates, learning groups,
and/or instructors. I have participated
in many webinars with the librarians across my school district. This granted us the flexibility to connect
wherever we were and hold a live chat.
Personally, I enjoyed being able to attend a meeting via webinar in the
comfort of my own home with my feet propped up.
Last semester at Walden University, our instructor assigned everyone to a
group. This allowed us to receive
and provide detailed feedback to each other regarding our individual projects. We communicated through a group Wiki we
created, email, and text message. These
tools allow us to participate in conversations outside of what we have normally
had, and with those that are not like-minded (Laureate Education, 2008).
Find at least two
blog posts by other educators on this topic and reflect on their positions in
your blog. Include links to these other blogs as you critique their ideas.
Reggie Malz blogged about a course in which the only way to
communicate was via email, and this could only be done with the instructor. This would definitely become frustrating,
especially if the instructor is not efficient with their emails. I agree the Class Café does promote
interaction and communication with both the students and instructor. This is a place students can ask other
students for their help or opinions regarding certain issues. Learners can connect here and share numbers,
blog links, skype info, etc. The issue
that was experienced here was a result of a poorly designed and implemented
class. I also question if the professor
even “wanted” to teach the course or if he was just told to follow the already
designed class with no prior training. I believe Reggie Malz does support and
promote communication, and agrees with George Siemens’ insights.
Jennifer Piner is on board with George Siemens, and also
shares some of the same thoughts as I do. I agree with Jennifer that if distance
education is implemented correctly it will offer a better learning experience
and collaborative interaction. Jennifer
agrees that being able to effectively and efficiently communicate is what
drives distance education. New
communication tools are opening doors to how we communicate with instructors
and classmates regarding assignments, projects, discussions, and questions. I like that Jennifer brought up the point
communication can provide students options.
This is something I believe many university instructors forget because they
stick with what they know or what has always been done. The moment they branch out and allow students
to try something new, they will see an increase in meaningful learning.
References
Laureate Education, Inc.
(Producer). (2008). The Future of Distance Education. United States:
Walden
University.
No comments:
Post a Comment